Avalanche has the most flexible architecture for PQC experiments on this list, because any subnet can run a custom VM with custom crypto. It also has zero subnets doing that. The capability everyone cites as a reason Avalanche could migrate fast is the same capability nobody has used.
Summary
Avalanche uses ECDSA secp256k1 (C-Chain) and BLS12-381 (P-Chain subnet validators). Subnet architecture allows custom VMs with alternative crypto, but no PQC work has shipped. Zero PQC research identified. Strong upgrade track record (Avalanche9000, Etna) gives coordination credibility only.
What the gates say
- Hybrid: FAIL. No hybrid plan on file.
- Evidence: PASS. Sources reconstructable by third party.
- Primitive naming: PASS. Named primitives at every scored sub-level.
Burn-vs-rescue policy on file
undeclared
Seven dimensions
Each dimension scores 0-100 internally; the weighted roll-up produces the QRI on the left. Open a row to read the sub-score detail.
1 Cryptographic Exposure 30 / 100
Multiple chain types with different primitives.
ECDSA secp256k1 (C-Chain, X-Chain transactions) · BLS12-381 (P-Chain subnet validator sigs) · Keccak-256 (EVM) · SHA-256No PQC families
No NIST PQC
2 HNDL Exposure 22 / 100
C-Chain EVM accounts expose pubkeys. 1,700 validators.
Mainnet since Sept 2020. Moderate cold exposure.
Subnet validator BLS sigs and C-Chain ECDSA forgeable post-Shor.
Standard TLS; Snowman consensus uses standard node TLS.
3 Metadata & Privacy Exposure 25 / 100
Transparent pseudonymous C-Chain; X-Chain slightly more opaque (UTXO).
Infura, Alchemy, Ava Labs RPC. Moderate concentration.
Avalanche Bridge (centralized), LayerZero, Wormhole, Chainlink CCIP.
Standard transparent ledger; no shielded pool.
4 Migration Architecture 42 / 100
Multi-VM architecture allows custom VMs with alternative crypto. Subnets can use different primitives.
C-Chain inherits ERC-4337; subnets can implement custom AA.
Avalanche9000 upgrade Nov 2024; Etna ACP-86 EVM upgrade 2025.
Subnet custom-VM model allows hybrid PQC experiments but no shipped work.
5 Deployment Execution 2 / 100
no public artifact found
no PQC in AvalancheGo
1,700 validators, no PQC keys
no PQC milestones
No PQC announcements
6 Supply Chain Vendor Readiness 6 / 100
7 Governance & Coordination 48 / 100
1,700 primary validators, 155K delegators.
Smooth Avalanche9000 and Etna upgrades. ACP process active.
Ava Labs (Emin Gun Sirer).
No documented adversarial crypto-change.
The X + Y vs Z inequality
X (data shelf life): 5-10 (EOA with key rotation; subnet validator keys 10+)
Y (migration time): 10-15
Z10 (10% CRQC year): 2036 · Z50 (50%): 2041
Verdict: X+Y > Z (danger).
Four-scenario grid
| Scenario | Value preserved | Privacy preserved |
|---|---|---|
| quantum never | 100% | 100% |
| arrives suddenly pre migration | 15% | 5% |
| arrives slowly post migration | 80% | 70% |
| arrives slowly mid migration | 45% | 30% |
Peers in the L1 profile
Order-book view of the 9 chains closest to Avalanche by QRI.
Public artifacts used for this scorecard
Each entry below is a sub-score citation. Clicking the link takes you to the public source. A third party should be able to reconstruct every number on this page from these URLs in 48 hours.
Multiple chain types with different primitives.
Supply chain snapshot
A chain's supply chain cannot migrate faster than its slowest dependency. Zero PQC roadmaps in any of the four categories is a structural blocker, not a lagging indicator.
Analyst notes on the scoring
Subnet architecture is one of the more flexible platforms for potential PQC experiments (custom VM per subnet) but Ava Labs has not prioritized this.
Scorecard metadata
- Profile: L1
- Scored: 2026-04-18 by
layerqu-v2-scoring-agent-1 - v1 reference:
chainscreen-v1-archive - QRI raw: 16 · after caps: 16
- Confidence interval: ±15
- PQC washing ratio: 1x
- Burn-vs-rescue: undeclared
Caps triggered
- mosca_cap_60
- sutor_stage_cap_2
- casado_stage_cap_3
- preskill_half_dim2_dim3_dim5_dim6
- hybrid_gate_fail_cap_60