Injective shipped a native EVM integration in 2025 across fifty validators without breaking anything, which is real upgrade muscle. That muscle has never been pointed at a cryptographic migration. The governance can move; nobody has asked it to move on PQC.
Summary
Injective is a Cosmos SDK L1 for derivatives/DeFi with native EVM (2025). ~50 validators and strong upgrade coordination history. No PQC activity — migration path exists in theory through Cosmos SDK modularity but nothing deployed or scheduled. Band 2 Acknowledged due to governance strength.
What the gates say
- Hybrid: FAIL. No hybrid plan on file.
- Evidence: PASS. Sources reconstructable by third party.
- Primitive naming: PASS. Named primitives at every scored sub-level.
Burn-vs-rescue policy on file
undeclared
Seven dimensions
Each dimension scores 0-100 internally; the weighted roll-up produces the QRI on the left. Open a row to read the sub-score detail.
1 Cryptographic Exposure 20 / 100
Cosmos SDK/Tendermint with native EVM (Injective EVM, 2025).
Ed25519 (Tendermint consensus) · ECDSA secp256k1 (CosmWasm + EVM) · SHA-256 · Keccak-256No PQC families deployed
No NIST PQC primitives deployed
2 HNDL Exposure 12 / 100
All user pubkeys exposed. TVL and derivatives positions exposed.
Active since Nov 2021. 4+ years of cold-key accumulation.
Derivatives positions short-lived but INJ holdings long-term.
Standard TLS. No PQC KEM.
3 Metadata & Privacy Exposure 25 / 100
Pseudonymous, transparent.
~50 validators operate RPC. Moderate concentration.
IBC + Wormhole + Peggy (ETH) bridges visible.
Low marginal retroactive risk.
4 Migration Architecture 30 / 100
Cosmos SDK modular. Governance can upgrade crypto via param change + binary upgrade.
Injective EVM + CosmWasm allow custom signature verification at app layer.
Multiple successful upgrades (V1.10+, EVM integration). Proven governance.
No hybrid PQC plan.
5 Deployment Execution 0 / 100
no public artifact found
no public artifact found
no public artifact found
no public artifact found
No PQC announcements.
6 Supply Chain Vendor Readiness 8 / 100
7 Governance & Coordination 40 / 100
~50 validators. Cosmos-style on-chain gov with INJ.
Successful multi-VM upgrade (EVM integration 2025). Strong coordination.
Injective Labs (Eric Chen, Albert Chon). No named PQC lead.
Burn auction + governance changes demonstrate coordination. No PQC precedent.
The X + Y vs Z inequality
X (data shelf life): 7-12 (4+ years of cold keys)
Y (migration time): 10-15
Z10 (10% CRQC year): 2036 · Z50 (50%): 2041
Verdict: X+Y > Z (danger).
Four-scenario grid
| Scenario | Value preserved | Privacy preserved |
|---|---|---|
| quantum never | 100% | 100% |
| arrives suddenly pre migration | 5% | 10% |
| arrives slowly post migration | 85% | 70% |
| arrives slowly mid migration | 40% | 30% |
Peers in the L1 profile
Order-book view of the 9 chains closest to Injective by QRI.
Public artifacts used for this scorecard
Each entry below is a sub-score citation. Clicking the link takes you to the public source. A third party should be able to reconstruct every number on this page from these URLs in 48 hours.
Cosmos SDK/Tendermint with native EVM (Injective EVM, 2025).
Supply chain snapshot
A chain's supply chain cannot migrate faster than its slowest dependency. Zero PQC roadmaps in any of the four categories is a structural blocker, not a lagging indicator.
Analyst notes on the scoring
Strong governance track record (EVM integration upgrade) is the only non-negligible positive. Zero PQC activity found. Dim7 relatively high on upgrade coordination.
Scorecard metadata
- Profile: L1
- Scored: 2026-04-18 by
layerqu-v2-scoring-agent-3 - v1 reference:
chainscreen-v1-archive - QRI raw: 14 · after caps: 14
- Confidence interval: ±12
- PQC washing ratio: 1x
- Burn-vs-rescue: undeclared
Caps triggered
- Mosca (5a<20% → QRI max 60)
- Sutor (5d=0 → Migration Stage max 2)
- Preskill (5, 2, 3 dims <3 artifacts × 0.5)
- Casado (4 vendor tiles pqc=0 → migration_stage max 3)
- Hybrid gate FAIL → QRI cap 60